Skip to content

Technology Comparison

The landscape of AI governance and verification technologies is rapidly evolving. This table compares Cybiont's integrated stack against traditional and contemporary approaches.

Approach Explainability Verifiability Regulatory Fit (FINMA/EU AI Act) Cybiont Status
Traditional ML Audit Post-hoc only Manual review Low Insufficient
Model Cards (Google) Documentation Self-reported Medium Insufficient
Confidential Computing None Execution environment Medium Used as substrate
Cybiont Stack Built-in confidence analytics Cryptographic proof with succinct aggregation High Patent-pending (Q3 2025)

Key Differentiators

  • Confidence Analytics: Cybiont continuously quantifies uncertainty and feeds the signal into adaptive governance workflows, unlike approaches focused solely on execution environment.
  • Risk-Proportionality: Validation depth scales automatically with the assessed risk profile, aligning with FINMA expectations for proportional governance.
  • Hybrid Consensus: Designed specifically for human-AI collaboration and prevention of AI-AI bias.